DVD - 2017 | Russian | Two DVD Special edition., Fullscreen edition.
Average Rating:
Rate this:
Inside a mysterious realm called the zone there is The Room, a place that will grant you your innermost desire. Stalker, a man that knows how to pass the deadly secrets of The Zone, escorts a group of people to the Room.
Publisher: [New York] : The Criterion Collection, [2017]
Edition: Two DVD Special edition., Fullscreen edition.
Copyright Date: ©2017
ISBN: 9781681433301
Branch Call Number: DVD Russian STA
Characteristics: 2 videodiscs (161 min.) :,sound, color ;,4 3/4 in. +,1 booklet.
DVD video, 4 3/4 in., rda
digital, optical, monaural, Dolby digital, rda
DVD-video, NTSC, rda
video file, DVD video, region 1, rda


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Nov 06, 2018

Big Ideas! Long Shots! Slow! Some of the most beautiful green you will see in a movie!

Oct 12, 2018

Epic, beautiful and mesmerizing film. True genius from the master Tarkovsky. Classic cinema for the truly enlightened. Images sculpted into time and memory. The only thing boring is people who are bored by this type of film. Masterpiece !!!!!! `420

Sep 14, 2018

COLLOSSAL waste of time.
Like all Russian film, it is super long, plodding, overly artsy and boring as hell.
In a nutshell, three men travel through a land of biohazards, radioactivity, rusty metal and broken down buildings - or as the rest of us know it, Russia. In between the boring trees and the boring puddles of medical waste, our three nameless bad actors talk about the meaning of ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ... I'm sorry, I nodded off just thinking about how excrutiatingly long and boring this piece of junk is. Anyway... Moe, Larry, and Curly meander through sewers of bio-sludge while eating borscht and pondering their place in the univerZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Ooops, it happened again... Rather than watching this film I suggest you do anything else: Watch some lovely paint dry; Review your tax filings for the past 10 years; Jab forks into your eyes. Really anything else.

Apr 30, 2018

While ostensibly an SF film, this is about as far from a big budget Hollywood SF blockbuster as it is possible to get. Like Tarkovsky's other great SF film, this is a glacially paced examination of big ideas. Loosely based upon the novel "Roadside Picnic" by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, Stalker follows the titular character as he illegally guides two men into the Zone, an area transformed by some event such that the normal laws of physics and causality no longer apply.

Instead of flashy special effects and the typical "save the world/galaxy/universe from some bad guys" plot, we get three men wandering slowly through a post-industrial landscape of ruined buildings being reclaimed by nature, where a wrong turn can result in a fate worse than death. The three have deep philosophical discussions despite the fact that there isn't a great deal of dialogue. Their goal (each man has his own motivation) is to reach a room where one's greatest wish becomes reality.

What is truly amazing about this film is how it conveys the transcendent beauty and simmering menace of the Zone with almost no special effects, simply through mood, music, cinematography and the very spare dialogue. I've watched this film many times and each time I find some detail or image or symbolism that I hadn't noticed before. A masterpiece of world cinema.

Apr 08, 2018

I came to this movie from comparisons to the recent Annihilation, and I was amazed at how similar the basic plot was. It took some of the shine off Annihilation, but this movie is mostly impressive and distinctive for how much non-action happens and how slow it is. If you want sci-fi you must bring an adept imagination because nothing will be shown on screen. By far this is the most I have seen in a movie of two never before contemplated categories: the backs of guy's heads and guys just resting, taking a nap if you will, in shallow fetid puddles of water. That seems incredibly uncomfortable to me, but whatever works.
If you can make it through the first ten minutes, you may as well stay for the rest. It helps bring your heart rate down to the super low rate needed to exist in this world. So little happens that at times water dripping or a dog trotting into sight to lay down will seem revelatory. The characters go in completely illogical meandering paths and do so in terror for things which never happen. It makes it possible in the viewers mind that there really is no palpable terror in the Zone, but perhaps the Stalker is completely unreliable and schizophrenic.
Despite it all, however, the movie draws you in with its mystery and reflection. The characters are archetypes to represent Science and Art. This offers a compelling debate about aspects of human nature and its various responses to life and death and the unknown.

Jan 15, 2018

Challenging, provocative, and ultimately rewarding, Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker is a mind-bending experience that defies explanation. Like Tarkovsky's earlier and similarly enigmatic science fiction classic Solaris, this long, slow, meditative masterpiece demands patience and total attention; anyone accustomed to faster pacing is likely to abandon the nearly three-hour film before its first hour is over. On the other hand, those who approach Tarkovsky's work in a properly receptive (and wide awake) frame of mind are likely to appreciate the film's seductive depth of theme and hypnotic imagery. Set in what appears to be a post-apocalyptic future (although the time-frame is never specified), the eerie and unsettling story focuses on the title character, Stalker (Aleksandr Kajdanovsky), who leads characters known only as the Writer (Anatoli Solonitsyn) and the Scientist (or Professor, played by Nikolai Grinko) into a mysterious region called The Zone. Tarkovsky films their journey as a long odyssey, or religious pilgrimage, and center of The Zone--said to be under an alien influence--is where each of these men hopes to find a kind of personal transcendence.

Jan 15, 2018

A true masterpiece of metaphysical filmmaking. Tarkovsky's movies are slow- a better word to use is meditative- Tarkovsky called it " sculpting in time ". If you pay careful attention by the end of the film your efforts will be rewarded with the 'big picture'.
An attention span is an awful thing to waste. You do not have to read the book to " get " this film ( if you're capable of thinking that is ), I would go so far as to classify this as an autonomous piece of art from the book. I try and watch this every couple of years- and see new things in it every time.

Jan 09, 2018

Not sure what all the fuss is about. I picked up this movie after reading the reviews and decided to give it a try. I don't think I've ever been so bored in a movie before. I kept waiting for something interesting to happen but nothing ever did. I appreciate that the movie is examining some deep themes, but it was just too philosophical and slow-paced to keep me interested.

Oct 02, 2017

This film was thought provoking, imaginative and in ways confounding. I loved it.

Jul 05, 2017

This is more than just a movie. It's a true work of art. I consider it an event in my life.

View All Comments

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number


Subject Headings


Find it at EPL

To Top